What does OBJ mean in LAW & LEGAL

When someone objects in court, they are voicing their disagreement with something that was said or presented in the courtroom. This could pertain to witness testimony, evidence introduced, legal arguments, or even procedural matters like questioning techniques used by attorneys.

Lawyers object during trials to challenge evidence or testimony that they think is inaccurate or irrelevant to the case at hand. Objections also allow lawyers to create delays in proceedings should they need extra time to prepare for certain testimonies or reevaluate their approaches.

The types of objections that can be raised during trial depend on the rules established by each jurisdiction's court system. Common objections include hearsay (statements made outside of court), non-compliance with legal standards for producing evidence, lack of foundation for introducing certain facts into evidence, relevance (unrelated information) and prejudice (offending a jury). Additionally, prosecutors may raise constitutional objections as well.

Yes, there are generally limits imposed on when objections may be made depending on the jurisdiction's rules of procedure regarding its court cases. For example, most states require an objection to be timely—made shortly after an issue arises—in order for it to hold up within a particular case. Additionally some issues cannot retroactively challenged via objection following their occurrence.

Generally speaking yes; attorneys have the right to withdraw their own objections as well as request judges overrule certain ones that have already been issued if needed.. In either instance a lawyer must provide sound reasoning behind his/her withdrawal so that other parties involved know why it is being done and how it affects matters at hand.