What does FRE mean in UNCLASSIFIED

The Federal Rules of Evidence govern the admissibility of evidence in federal courts. They set out a system for deciding what evidence can be presented to the jury or judge in a civil or criminal trial, based on its relevancy and reliability.

An evidentiary privilege is a legal rule that protects certain communications from disclosure during judicial proceedings. Privileges are typically recognized under common law or statutes and often depend upon the relationship between the communicating parties. Common evidentiary privileges include attorney-client privilege and spousal testimony privilege.

Hearsay is generally not admissible as evidence under FRE unless it falls into one of several exceptions. These exceptions may include statements by a party-opponent, statements against interest, prior consistent statements, present sense impressions, excited utterances and dying declarations.

Under FRE, an inference is an assumption used to draw conclusions from facts that have been established in court proceedings. Inference allows for permissible deductions that result from logical processes such as comparison and contrast to demonstrate relationships between multiple facts or series of facts.

Under FRE, an authenticated document is one whose authenticity has been established in court proceedings through reliable evidence such as witnesses’ testimonies or other acceptable sources of proof such as written records or photographs. This process must meet certain requirements for authentication before it can be admitted as evidence in court..

Relevance can be challenged by either side during a trial through cross-examination or by objecting to evidence being introduced by opposing counsel. For example, if counsel attempts to enter evidence which they believe does not meet the threshold test for relevance according to FRE, they may move to exclude it from the jury's consideration.

Yes, experts are allowed to testify at trial if their expertise would help inform the matters at hand and would therefore assist with proper fact-finding during proceedings according to FRE rules 702–706. For instance, if expert testimony on medical issues could resolve disputes about causation or damages due to medical negligence then expert witness testimony would likely be required.

Opinion testimony may be admitted as evidence at trial provided that it meets certain relevancy requirements set out by federal law according precedent set forth through various judicial opinions over time cited within important cases pertaining relevant matters associated with legal decisions involving Federal Rules of Evidence.

Physical exhibits like tangible objects can be used as an exhibit at trial provided that they meet specific criteria set out by FRE regarding admissibility such as authentication and relevancy standards previously discussed.