What does FMA mean in US GOVERNMENT
The Federal Marriage Amendment (FMA) is a proposed amendment to the United States Constitution that would define marriage as the union of one man and one woman. This amendment follows a larger trend of legislative action, at both state and federal levels, attempting to define the terms of marriage in order to prevent same-sex couples from being able to marry legally. If passed, this amendment would become part of the Constitution and could not be changed or amended by any court ruling. This article will explain what FMA means, its full form and context in which it is used primarily in Governmental Matters.
FMA meaning in US Government in Governmental
FMA mostly used in an acronym US Government in Category Governmental that means Federal Marriage Amendment
Shorthand: FMA,
Full Form: Federal Marriage Amendment
For more information of "Federal Marriage Amendment", see the section below.
What FMA Means
The Federal Marriage Amendment is an effort by some legislators to put into law a definition of what they consider to be "traditional" marriage - the union between one man and one woman. The FMA has been proposed in various forms since 2004 but has failed on each occasion due to lack of support. While the exact language of the amendment changes from proposal to proposal, the core concept remains the same; marriage can only legally occur between opposite sex couples.
Full Form
The full form of FMA stands for Federal Marriage Amendment and refers specifically to various proposals by members of Congress seeking to amend the U.S Constitution with language defining marriage as being between one man and one woman.
Context In Which It Is Used Primarily In Governmental Matters
The primary context in which FMA is used is during debates about legislation related to same-sex marriage or other forms of relationship recognition for non-heterosexual couples. Legislators wishing to pass laws barring legal recognition for such relationships have often sought first to pass an amendment like this so that no court decision could overturn such laws even if unconstitutional under other provisions within federal or state Constitutions. However, due to lack of support amongst legislators, no such amendment has yet been passed.
Essential Questions and Answers on Federal Marriage Amendment in "GOVERNMENTAL»USGOV"
What is the Federal Marriage Amendment?
The Federal Marriage Amendment is a proposed amendment to the US Constitution that would define marriage as exclusively between one man and one woman. It was first proposed in 2004 and has yet to pass in either the House or Senate.
What would be the purpose of the Federal Marriage Amendment?
The primary purpose of introducing such an amendment would be to ensure that same-sex marriages are not recognized under federal law, despite any state laws that may have been passed to legalize them. Additionally, it could potentially be used to void any existing same-sex marriages that have already taken place on the federal level.
Who proposed the Federal Marriage Amendment?
The Federal Marriage Amendment was originally proposed by former President George W. Bush in 2004 during his re-election campaign. Since then, it has been supported by conservative politicians and religious groups who believe marriage should only be between a man and a woman.
How likely is it that the Federal Marriage Amendment will become law?
At present, it seems unlikely that this amendment will make its way through Congress and become part of the US Constitution. Not only does it need a two-thirds majority vote in both houses of Congress, but then it must also be ratified by three-fourths of state legislatures across America before becoming official law.
Are there any alternatives to passing a constitutional amendment on marriage?
Yes, states have the power to recognize same-sex marriages within their own territories without having to change federal law or introduce new amendments. This has already been done in several states, including Massachusetts and California.
Could this kind of amendment undermine civil rights or civil liberties for LGBT individuals?
Yes, if such an amendment were passed, it could lead to discrimination against LGBT individuals and families by codifying into constitutional law a definition of marriage which excludes them from participating in certain legal privileges and rights guaranteed to married couples under US law.
Is there any precedence set by other countries for this type of legislation?
There are some examples from other countries where similar constitutional changes have been put into effect with varying degrees of success or consequence - most notably India which recently struck down its colonial era "anti-sodomy" laws after much public outcry and debate over civil rights issues.
What kinds of legal challenges could arise if such an amendment were challenged in court?
It is possible that same sex couples might attempt to challenge such an amendment on grounds such as equal protection under the law or due process rights; however, these kinds of cases are difficult and often costly for plaintiffs as they proceed through lengthy court proceedings.
Final Words:
In conclusion, FMA stands for Federal Marriage Amendment and refers specifically to an effort by some legislators to amend the United States Constitution defining marriage as a union between one man and one woman only – preventing same-sex couples from obtaining legal recognition through civil ceremonies or other means granted through law. The primary context in which this abbreviation is used is related largely debate surrounding government proposals regarding same-sex marriage or other forms of relationship recognition for those who are not heterosexuals.
FMA also stands for: |
|
| All stands for FMA |