What does AFTA mean in UNCLASSIFIED

Agree First Talk After (AFTA) is a communication strategy designed to promote effective and efficient negotiation. It encourages a team to explore potential outcomes before entering negotiations, paving the way for long-term solutions that benefit both parties. In this approach, parties come together with an agreed list of needs and goals and then work through those points in order to reach a mutually beneficial resolution.

AFTA differs from traditional negotiation techniques in that it focuses on reaching consensus upfront before any negotiating begins. This means that all parties involved come together with a clear understanding of what needs to be accomplished and how they will work together to do so. With all participants in agreement beforehand, it becomes easier to move forward quickly with the negotiations instead of haggling over details as they arise.

Agree First Talk After offers several distinct advantages over more traditional methods. By beginning with consensus before negotiating, it eliminates much of the time-consuming back-and-forth between parties that can result in stalemates or false compromises. Additionally, because each party has already expressed their desires before discussing possible solutions, it prevents posturing or agenda setting during the actual negotiations. Finally, by having an agreed upon list of objectives prior to discussions beginning, AFTA increases efficiency by allowing both sides to focus on what’s necessary now rather than getting bogged down in unnecessary debates.

While Agree First Talk After can be useful in many types of negotiations, it may not be suitable for situations which require more flexibility than what the model allows for or when there are specific concerns that can only be resolved through dialogue during the actual bargaining stage. It is important to consider all factors before deciding if this approach is right for you and your situation.

You should consider using Agree First Talk After when you have clearly defined objectives and need an efficient way to reach agreement between multiple sides without getting caught up in minor details or disagreements along the way. An example would be renegotiations around existing contracts where both sides are looking for cost savings without major changes to scope or delivery timelines; by agreeing up front on what’s important ahead of time, teams can negotiate quickly and easily while eliminating disputes related less important points later on down the line.

Agree First Talk After may not always be appropriate depending on the context or nature of disputes being negotiated - such as when one side holds significant power over another or either side has drastically different needs that might require creative solutions not available within a single pre-negotiated list - as well as strategic decisions which are best made after both sides understand their respective positions more fully first.

The Agree First Talk After technique is most commonly used by organizations looking for an organized methodical approach to resolving contractual disputes without resorting to more adversarial methods like litigation or arbitration.