What does FGAN mean in UNCLASSIFIED


A FGAN occurs when a Wikipedia article nominated for "Good Article" status fails to meet the criteria for that status during the peer review process.

FGAN

FGAN meaning in Unclassified in Miscellaneous

FGAN mostly used in an acronym Unclassified in Category Miscellaneous that means Failed Good Article Nomination

Shorthand: FGAN,
Full Form: Failed Good Article Nomination

For more information of "Failed Good Article Nomination", see the section below.

» Miscellaneous » Unclassified

Key Features of FGAN

  • Quality Standards: FGAN articles typically have a high level of quality but fall short of the exceptional standards required for Good Article designation.
  • Missed Criteria: Articles may fail FGAN nomination for reasons such as insufficient research, weak referencing, or lack of comprehensive coverage.
  • Potential for Improvement: FGAN articles can often be improved by addressing the identified weaknesses and resubmitting for Good Article review.

Benefits of FGAN

  • Feedback and Guidance: FGAN provides valuable feedback to article editors, highlighting areas for improvement.
  • Recognition of Good Work: Even though articles may not receive Good Article status, FGAN acknowledges the effort and quality put into their creation.
  • Motivation for Improvement: FGAN can motivate editors to make further improvements and strive for higher standards.

Essential Questions and Answers on Failed Good Article Nomination in "MISCELLANEOUS»UNFILED"

What is a FGAN (Failed Good Article Nomination)?

What are the reasons for a FGAN?

There are various reasons for a FGAN, including:

  • Lack of comprehensive or verifiable sources
  • Insufficient detail or depth of coverage
  • Organizational or structural issues
  • Neutral point of view not maintained
  • Poor writing style or grammar

What happens after a FGAN?

After a FGAN, the article remains in its current state and is not considered a "Good Article." The nominating editor or other contributors may choose to address the concerns raised during the peer review process and resubmit the article for nomination at a later date.

Does a FGAN have a negative impact on an article?

No, a FGAN does not have a negative impact on an article. It simply indicates that the article did not meet the Good Article criteria at the time of nomination. Articles can still be improved and resubmitted for Good Article status.

What can I do if my article is a FGAN?

If your article is a FGAN, it is recommended to:

  • Read the peer review comments carefully and address the concerns raised.
  • Expand the article with additional information from reliable sources.
  • Improve the organization and structure of the article.
  • Ensure that a neutral point of view is maintained.
  • Proofread the article for errors in grammar and style.
  • Resubmit the article for Good Article nomination after making the necessary improvements.

Final Words: FGAN is a significant milestone in the Wikipedia quality assessment process. Articles that receive this result have the potential to become exceptional resources, with a little more effort and refinement. By understanding and addressing the weaknesses identified in FGAN nominations, editors can contribute to the creation of high-quality content that enriches Wikipedia's vast knowledge base.

Citation

Use the citation below to add this abbreviation to your bibliography:

Style: MLA Chicago APA

  • "FGAN" www.englishdbs.com. 05 Nov, 2024. <https://www.englishdbs.com/abbreviation/1044580>.
  • www.englishdbs.com. "FGAN" Accessed 05 Nov, 2024. https://www.englishdbs.com/abbreviation/1044580.
  • "FGAN" (n.d.). www.englishdbs.com. Retrieved 05 Nov, 2024, from https://www.englishdbs.com/abbreviation/1044580.
  • New

    Latest abbreviations

    »
    O
    A Disorder Characterized By Multiple Enchondromas
    S
    Survei Khusus Konsumsi Rumah Tangga
    V
    a collection of C libraries designed for computer vision research and implementation
    J
    J Joseph Consulting
    B
    Basically Have A Life